Predicting response time on self-report rating scale assessments of noncognitive constructs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Predicting response time on self-report rating scale assessments of noncognitive constructs

Published:2023-08-21 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1554-3528
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Behav Res

Author:

Lyu Weicong^ORCID,Bolt Daniel M.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-023-02073-w.pdf

Reference26 articles.

1. Adams, D. J., Bolt, D. M., Deng, S., Smith, S. S., & Baker, T. B. (2019). Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(3), 466–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12169.

2. Akrami, N., Hedlund, L.-E., & Ekehammar, B. (2007). Personality scale response latencies as self-schema indicators: The inverted-U effect revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.005.

3. Amelang, M., Eisenhut, K., & Rindermann, H. (1991). Responding to adjective check list items: A reaction time analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 12 (6), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90247-9.

4. Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. (2001). Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840.

5. Böckenholt, U. (2012). Modeling multiple response processes in judgment and choice. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 665–678. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028111.