Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming
-
Published:2022-03-16
Issue:1
Volume:55
Page:151-167
-
ISSN:1554-3528
-
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Behav Res
Author:
Angele Bernhard,Baciero Ana,Gómez Pablo,Perea Manuel
Abstract
AbstractMasked priming is one of the most important paradigms in the study of visual word recognition, but it is usually thought to require a laboratory setup with a known monitor and keyboard. To test if this technique can be safely used in an online setting, we conducted two online masked priming lexical decision task experiments using PsychoPy/PsychoJS (Peirce et al., 2019). Importantly, we also tested the role of prime exposure duration (33.3 vs. 50 ms in Experiment 1 and 16.7 vs. 33.3 ms in Experiment 2), thus allowing us to examine both across conditions and within-conditions effects. We found that our online data are indeed very similar to the masked priming data previously reported in the masked priming literature. Additionally, we found a clear effect of prime duration, with the priming effect (measured in terms of response time and accuracy) being stronger at 50 ms than 33.3 ms and no priming effect at 16.7 ms prime duration. From these results, we can conclude that modern online browser-based experimental psychophysics packages (e.g., PsychoPy) can present stimuli and collect responses on standard end user devices with enough precision. These findings provide us with confidence that masked priming can be used online, thus allowing us not only to run less time-consuming experiments, but also to reach populations that are difficult to test in a laboratory.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference76 articles.
1. Adelman, J. S., Johnson, R. L., McCormick, S. F., McKague, M., Kinoshita, S., Bowers, J. S., Perry, J. R., Lupker, S. J., Forster, K. I., Cortese, M. J., Scaltritti, M., Aschenbrenner, A. J., Coane, J. H., White, L., Yap, M. J., Davis, C., Kim, J., & Davis, C. J. (2014). A behavioral database for masked form priming. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y 2. Aguasvivas, J., Carreiras, M., Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2020). How do Spanish speakers read words? Insights from a crowdsourced lexical decision megastudy. Behavior Research Methods, 52(5), 1867–1882. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01357-9 3. Alluhaybi, I., & Witzel, J. (2020). Letter connectedness and Arabic visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1660–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820926155 4. Anwyl-Irvine, A., Dalmaijer, E. S., Hodges, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020a). Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5 5. Anwyl-Irvine, A., Massonni, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020b). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|