Abstract
AbstractThe construct of personal control is crucial for understanding a variety of human behaviors. Perceived lack of control affects performance and psychological well-being in diverse contexts – educational, organizational, clinical, and social. Thus, it is important to know to what extent we can rely on the established experimental manipulations of (lack of) control. In this article, we examine the construct validity of recall-based manipulations of control (or lack thereof). Using existing datasets (Study 1a and 1b: N = 627 and N = 454, respectively) we performed content-based analyses of control experiences induced by two different procedures (free recall and positive events recall). The results indicate low comparability between high and low control conditions in terms of the emotionality of a recalled event, the domain and sphere of control, amongst other differences. In an experimental study that included three types of recall-based control manipulations (Study 2: N = 506), we found that the conditions differed not only in emotionality but also in a generalized sense of control. This suggests that different aspects of personal control can be activated, and other constructs evoked, depending on the experimental procedure. We discuss potential sources of variability between control manipulation procedures and propose improvements in practices when using experimental manipulations of sense of control and other psychological constructs.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
2. Bandura, A. (1997b). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
3. Bargh, J. D., & Chartrand, T. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barzykowski, K., Riess, M., Hajdas, S., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2019). School in our memory: Do we remember our time in middle and high school differently ? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(4), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1621320
5. Barzykowski, K., & Staugaard, S. R. (2016). Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories. British Journal of Psychology, 107(3), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12160