Dimensionality assessment in the presence of wording effects: A network psychometric and factorial approach-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dimensionality assessment in the presence of wording effects: A network psychometric and factorial approach

Published:2024-02-20 Issue:6 Volume:56 Page:6179-6197
ISSN:1554-3528
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
language:en
Short-container-title:Behav Res

Author:

Garcia-Pardina Alejandro,Abad Francisco J.^ORCID,Christensen Alexander P.^ORCID,Golino Hudson^ORCID,Garrido Luis Eduardo^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13428-024-02348-w.pdf

Reference70 articles.

1. Aichholzer, J. (2014). Random intercept EFA of personality scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001

2. Arias, V. B., Garrido, L. E., Jenaro, C., Martínez-Molina, A., & Arias, B. (2020). A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 2489–2505. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01401-8

3. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204

4. Auerswald, M., & Moshagen, M. (2019). How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000200

5. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Jagan, M., & Davis, T. A. (2023). Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods. R package version 1.6–1.1. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Matrix/index.html