Abstract
AbstractWe present a method to automatically calculate time to fixate (TTF) from the eye-tracker data in subjects with neurological impairment using a driving simulator. TTF presents the time interval for a person to notice the stimulus from its first occurrence. Precisely, we measured the time since the children started to cross the street until the drivers directed their look to the children. From 108 neurological patients recruited for the study, the analysis of TTF was performed in 56 patients to assess fit-, unfit-, and conditionally-fit-to-drive patients. The results showed that the proposed method based on the YOLO (you only look once) object detector is efficient for computing TTFs from the eye-tracker data. We obtained discriminative results for fit-to-drive patients by application of Tukey’s honest significant difference post hoc test (p < 0.01), while no difference was observed between conditionally-fit and unfit-to-drive groups (p = 0.542). Moreover, we show that time-to-collision (TTC), initial gaze distance (IGD) from pedestrians, and speed at the hazard onset did not influence the result, while the only significant interaction is among fitness, IGD, and TTC on TTF. Obtained TTFs are also compared with the perception response times (PRT) calculated independently from eye-tracker data and YOLO. Although we reached statistically significant results that speak in favor of possible method application for assessment of fitness to drive, we provide detailed directions for future driving simulation-based evaluation and propose processing workflow to secure reliable TTF calculation and its possible application in for example psychology and neuroscience.
Funder
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference57 articles.
1. Al Amin, I. H., & Arby, F. H. (2022). Implementation of YOLO-v5 for a real time social distancing detection. Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 6(1), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v6i1.3484
2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. British Standards Institution.
3. Bradski, G., & Kaehler, A. (2008). Learning OpenCV: Computer vision with the OpenCV library. O’Reilly Media Inc.
4. Broen, N. L., & Chiang, D. P. (1996). Braking response times for 100 drivers in the avoidance of an unexpected obstacle as measured in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol.40 No. 18, pp. 900–904). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129604001807
5. Bulling, A., Roggen, D., & Tröster, G. (2009). Wearable EOG goggles: Seamless sensing and context-awareness in everyday environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 1(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-2009-0020