Building and benchmarking the motivated deception corpus: Improving the quality of deceptive text through gaming

Author:

Barsever Dan,Steyvers Mark,Neftci Emre

Abstract

AbstractWhen one studies fake news or false reviews, the first step to take is to find a corpus of text samples to work with. However, most deceptive corpora suffer from an intrinsic problem: there is little incentive for the providers of the deception to put their best effort, which risks lowering the quality and realism of the deception. The corpus described in this project, the Motivated Deception Corpus, aims to rectify this problem by gamifying the process of deceptive text collection. By having subjects play the game Two Truths and a Lie, and by rewarding those subjects that successfully fool their peers, we collect samples in such a way that the process itself improves the quality of the text. We have amassed a large corpus of deceptive text that is strongly incentivized to be convincing, and thus more reflective of real deceptive text. We provide results from several configurations of neural network prediction models to establish machine learning benchmarks on the data. This new corpus is demonstratively more challenging to classify with the current state of the art than previous corpora.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference35 articles.

1. Abouelenien, M., Pérez-Rosas, V., Mihalcea, R., & Burzo, M. (2016). Detecting deceptive behavior via integration of discriminative features from multiple modalities. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(5), 1042–1055.

2. Amazon, A. (2014). Amazon customer reviews dataset. https://s3.amazonaws.com/amazon-reviews-pds/readme.html Aphiwongsophon,S.,&Chongstitvatana,P.(2018)Detectingfakenewswithmachinelearningmethod,528–531. Barsever,D.,Singh,S.,&Neftci,E.(2020)BuildingaBetterLieDetectorwithBERT:TheDifference BetweenTruthandLies,1–7.

3. Carrieri,V.,Madio,L.,&Principe,F.(2019).Vaccinehesitancyand(fake)news:Quasi-experimentalevidence fromItaly.Healtheconomics,28(11),1377–1382.

4. Chen,D.L.,Schonger,M.,&Wickens,C.(2016).oTree—Anopen-sourceplatformforlaboratory,online, andfieldexperiments.JournalofBehavioralandExperimentalFinance,9,88–97.

5. Council,N.R.(2003)Thepolygraphandliedetection.Washington:NationalAcademiesPress.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3