Rapid, reliable mobile assessment of affect-related motor processing
-
Published:2022-12-16
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1554-3528
-
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Behav Res
Author:
Howlett Jonathon R.ORCID, Larkin Florence, Touthang James, Kuplicki Rayus T., Lim Kelvin O., Paulus Martin P.
Abstract
AbstractMobile technologies can be used for behavioral assessments to associate changes in behavior with environmental context and its influence on mental health and disease. Research on real-time motor control with a joystick, analyzed using a computational proportion-derivative (PD) modeling approach, has shown that model parameters can be estimated with high reliability and are related both to self-reported fear and to brain structures important for affective regulation, such as the anterior cingulate cortex. Here we introduce a mobile version of this paradigm, the rapid assessment of motor processing (RAMP) paradigm, and show that it provides robust, reliable, and accessible behavioral measurements relevant to mental health. A smartphone version of a previous joystick sensorimotor task was developed in which participants control a virtual car to a stop sign and stop. A sample of 89 adults performed the task, with 66 completing a second retest session. A PD modeling approach was applied to compute Kp (drive) and Kd (damping) parameters. Both Kp and Kd exhibited high test-retest reliabilities (ICC .81 and .78, respectively). Replicating a previous finding from a different sample with the joystick version of the task, both Kp and Kd were negatively associated with self-reported fear. The RAMP paradigm, a mobile sensorimotor assessment, can be used to assess drive and damping during motor control, which is robustly associated with subjective affect. This paradigm could be useful for examining dynamic contextual modulation of affect-related processing, which could improve assessment of the effects of interventions for psychiatric disorders in a real-world context.
Funder
National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Institute on Drug Abuse U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs William K. Warren Foundation National Institute of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference19 articles.
1. Boogerd, E. A., Arts, T., Engelen, L. J., & van de Belt, T. H. (2015). "What is eHealth": Time for an update? JMIR Research Protocols, 4(1), e29. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.4065 2. Burke, L. E., Shiffman, S., Music, E., Styn, M. A., Kriska, A., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D., Ewing, L. J., Chasens, E., French, B., Mancino, J., Mendez, D., Strollo, P., & Rathbun, S. L. (2017). Ecological momentary assessment in behavioral research: Addressing technological and human participant challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), e77. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7138 3. Cohen, A. S., Cox, C. R., Tucker, R. P., Mitchell, K. R., Schwartz, E. K., Le, T. P., Foltz, P. W., Holmlund, T. B., & Elvevåg, B. (2021). Validating biobehavioral Technologies for use in clinical psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 503323–503323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.503323 4. Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007 5. Enkavi, A. Z., Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Mazza, G. L., MacKinnon, D. P., Marsch, L. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Large-scale analysis of test-retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(12), 5472–5477. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818430116
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|