Automatic discovery and description of human planning strategies
-
Published:2023-05-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1554-3528
-
Container-title:Behavior Research Methods
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Behav Res
Author:
Skirzyński JulianORCID, Jain Yash Raj, Lieder Falk
Abstract
AbstractScientific discovery concerns finding patterns in data and creating insightful hypotheses that explain these patterns. Traditionally, each step of this process required human ingenuity. But the galloping development of computer chips and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) make it increasingly more feasible to automate some parts of scientific discovery. Understanding human planning is one of the fields in which AI has not yet been utilized. State-of-the-art methods for discovering new planning strategies still rely on manual data analysis. Data about the process of human planning is often used to group similar behaviors together. Researchers then use this data to formulate verbal descriptions of the strategies which might underlie those groups of behaviors. In this work, we leverage AI to automate these two steps of scientific discovery. We introduce a method for automatic discovery and description of human planning strategies from process-tracing data collected with the Mouselab-MDP paradigm. Our method utilizes a new algorithm, called Human-Interpret, that performs imitation learning to describe sequences of planning operations in terms of a procedural formula and then translates that formula to natural language. We test our method on a benchmark data set that researchers have previously scrutinized manually. We find that the descriptions of human planning strategies that we obtain automatically are about as understandable as human-generated descriptions. They also cover a substantial proportion of relevant types of human planning strategies that had been discovered manually. Our method saves scientists’ time and effort, as all the reasoning about human planning is done automatically. This might make it feasible to more rapidly scale up the search for yet undiscovered cognitive strategies that people use for planning and decision-making to many new decision environments, populations, tasks, and domains. Given these results, we believe that the presented work may accelerate scientific discovery in psychology, and due to its generality, extend to problems from other fields.
Funder
Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference70 articles.
1. Abelson, R, & Levi, A (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G Lindzey, & E Aronson (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 2. Addis, M, Sozou, PD, Lane, PC, & Gobet, F (2016). Computational scientific discovery and cognitive science theories. In Computing and philosophy, Springer, pp 83–97. 3. Agrawal, M, Peterson, J C, & Griffiths, T L (2020). Scaling up psychology via scientific regret minimization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8825–8835. 4. Araki, B, Vodrahalli, K, Leech, T, Vasile, C I, Donahue, M, & Rus, D (2019). Learning to Plan with Logical Automata. In Robotics: Science and systems conference (RSS), Messe Freiburg, Germany (pp. 1–9). 5. Bacon, F Fowler, T (Ed.) (1878). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
|
|