Abstract
AbstractMeasurement invariance (MI) of a psychometric scale is a prerequisite for valid group comparisons of the measured construct. While the invariance of loadings and intercepts (i.e., scalar invariance) supports comparisons of factor means and observed means with continuous items, a general belief is that the same holds with ordered-categorical (i.e., ordered-polytomous and dichotomous) items. However, as this paper shows, this belief is only partially true—factor mean comparison is permissible in the correctly specified scalar invariance model with ordered-polytomous items but not with dichotomous items. Furthermore, rather than scalar invariance, full strict invariance—invariance of loadings, thresholds, intercepts, and unique factor variances in all items—is needed when comparing observed means with both ordered-polytomous and dichotomous items. In a Monte Carlo simulation study, we found that unique factor noninvariance led to biased estimations and inferences (e.g., with inflated type I error rates of 19.52%) of (a) the observed mean difference for both ordered-polytomous and dichotomous items and (b) the factor mean difference for dichotomous items in the scalar invariance model. We provide a tutorial on invariance testing with ordered-categorical items as well as suggestions on mean comparisons when strict invariance is violated. In general, we recommend testing strict invariance prior to comparing observed means with ordered-categorical items and adjusting for partial invariance to compare factor means if strict invariance fails.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference60 articles.
1. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B.O. (2020). IRT in Mplus (Version 4). http://www.statmodel.com/download/MplusIRT.pdf
2. Avison, W. R., & McAlpine, D. D. (1992). Gender differences in symptoms of depression among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137248
3. Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. The Guilford Press.
4. Bauer, D. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077
5. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395–479). Addison-Wesley.