1. Galati, A., & Avraamides, M. N. (2012). Collaborating in spatial tasks: Partners adapt the perspective of their descriptions, coordination strategies, and memory representations. In C. Stachniss, K. Schill, & D. Uttal (Eds.), Spatial cognition (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol. 7463) (pp. 182–195). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2. Galati, A., & Avraamides, M. N. (2013a). Flexible spatial perspective-taking: Conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618
3. Galati, A., & Avraamides, M. N. (2013b). The intrinsic structure of spatial configurations and the partner’s viewpoint shape spatial memories and descriptions. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Cooperative minds: Social interaction and group dynamics. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 466–471). Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.
4. Greenauer, N., Mello, C., Kelly, J. W., & Avraamides, M. N. (2013). Integrating spatial information across experiences. Psychological Research, 77, 540–554. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0452-x
5. Greenauer, N., & Waller, D. (2008). Intrinsic array structure is neither necessary nor sufficient for nonegocentric coding of spatial layouts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1015–1021. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.1015