Author:
Baron Jonathan,Gürçay Burcu
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference25 articles.
1. Baron, J. (in press). Utilitarian vs. deontological reasoning: Method, results, and theory. In Bonnefon, J.-F., & Trémolière, B. (Eds.) (Forthcoming). Moral inferences. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
2. Baron, J., Gürçay, B., & Luce, M. F. (in press). Correlations of trait and state emotions with utilitarian moral judgments. Cognition and Emotion.
3. Baron, J., Gürçay, B., Moore, A. B., & Starcke, K. (2012). Use of a rasch model to predict response times to utilitarian moral dilemmas. Synthese, 189(Supplement 1), 107–117. (special issue on Psychological Models of (Ir)rationality and Decision Making, edited by C. Witteman & W. van der Hoek).
4. Baron, J., Scott, S., Fincher, K., & Metz, S. E. (2015). Why does the cognitive reflection test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 265–284. special issue on Modeling and Aiding Intuitions in Organizational Decision Making, edited by J. Marewski & U. Hoffrage. doi:
10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.003
5. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献