Author:
Harrington Erin E.,Reese-Melancon Celinda,Turner Rachael L.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Ball, H., & Bugg, J. M. (2018). Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1405–1415. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1442-9
2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
3. Borkowski, J. G., Johnston, M. B., & Reid, M. K. (1987). Metacognition, motivation, and controlled performance. Handbook of Cognitive, Social, and Neuropsychological Aspects of Learning Disabilities: Volume 2 (2nd ed., pp. 147–174). Routledge.
4. Cona, G., Bisiacchi, P. S., Sartori, G., & Scarpazza, C. (2016). Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25983
5. Dohrenwend, B. (2008). Some effects of open and closed questions on respondents’ answers. Human Organization, 24(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.24.2.u5838w33858455u3