1. Baird, J. C., &Biersdorf, W. R. (1967). Quantitative functions for size and distance judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 161–166.
2. Bingham, G. P . (2003).Calibration of distance and size does not calibrate shape information: Comparison of dynamic monocular and static and dynamic binocular vision. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., &Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1314–1344.
4. Bingham, G. P ., Crowell, J. A., & Todd, J. T. (2001, May).Distortions of distance and shape do not reflect a single continuous transformation on reach space. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
5. Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F., Robin, D., &Shull, J. A. (2000). Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1436–1460.