1. Bouts, P., Spears, R., &van der Pligt, J. (1992). Counterfactual processing and the correspondence between events and outcomes: Normality versus value.European Journal of Social Psychology,22, 387–396.
2. Branscombe, N. R., N’gbala, A., Kobrynowicz, D., &Wann, D. L. (1997). Self and group protection concerns influence attributions but they are not determinants of counterfactual mutation focus.British Journal of Social Psychology,36, 387–404.
3. Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T. A., &Coleman, J. (1996). Rape and accident counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome?Journal of Applied Social Psychology,26, 1042–1067.
4. Byrne, R. M. J. (1997). Cognitive processes in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 105–154). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Byrne, R. M. J., Culhane, R., &Tasso, A. (1995). The temporality effect in thinking about what might have been. In J. Moore & J. Lehman (Eds.),Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 385–390). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.