Abstract
Hindus regard all humans as fundamentally unequal. Hindu society is organized around groupings of people into ranked castes. On this there is general agreement, as Dumont's apt characterization, Homo hierarchies, affirms and attests. No similar agreement exists, however, as to the criterion of caste rank. On the one hand, attributional theorists such as H.N.C. Stevenson emphasize the physical nature of a caste and its placement on a continuum of purity and impurity, with the more pure castes held to rank above the less pure. On the other hand, interactional theorists like McKim Marriott emphasize the coded exchange between castes of culturally valued foods and services, with the givers of food held to rank above the receivers, and the receivers of service above the givers; here it is not the religious values of purity and impurity, but behavioral dominance that seems to be at issue.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference11 articles.
1. “Interactional and Attributional Theories of-Caste Ranking,”;Man in India,1959
2. Until Marriage Do Us Part: A Cultural Account of Jaffna Tamil Categories for Kinsman
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Embodied morality and spiritual destiny in the Bhāgavata Purāṇa;International Journal of Hindu Studies;2002-08
2. Bibliography;Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age;1999-07-15
3. Glossary;Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age;1999-07-15
4. Conclusion;Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age;1999-07-15
5. ‘Caste wars’ and the mandate of violence;Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age;1999-07-15