Abstract
This is the first in a series of articles outlining a new approach to Semantics. The novelty in the approach is that the concept of an interpretation of a logical system is taken as the central concept of Semantics. I hope to show that by means of this approach a satisfactory definition can be given for such controversial concepts as analyticity, and at the same time the approach leads to a unified foundation for formalized Semantics.As the possibility of such definitions has been questioned in recent years, it is an important task to try to give precise definitions. Clearly, this is the task of those philosophers who believe that concepts like analyticity should play a fundamental role in Semantics. On the other hand, the philosophers who have criticized these concepts will now be able to tell just exactly why these definitions are unacceptable to them — instead of being forced to talk in generalities. It seems to me that no further progress is possible until we have precise definitions available for discussion.The fundamental semantic concepts fall into two classes: those, like truth, for which Tarski has offered definitions; and those additional ones, like analytic truth, for which we have Carnap's proposed definitions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Grounding Medieval Consequence;Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action;2024
2. The Semantic Account of Formal Consequence, from Alfred Tarski Back to John Buridan;International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées;2023
3. What Was the Syntax-Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2015-09-03
4. A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE THEORY OF MODELS;The Theory of Models;2014
5. Logic in the 1930s: Type Theory and Model Theory;The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic;2013-09