Abstract
This paper attempts to redefine the nature and conditions of bondservants in the late Ming, particularly in the highly productive T'ai-hu basin. It proposes that the great economic and social differences among bondservants obliges us to treat bondservitude as a legal status, not as a class. It discusses the many causes of bondservitude and its highly varied conditions. Agricultural bondservants accounted for no more than one-fifth of the rural population and usually had to pay rent and perform specific manual duties for their master. Bondservant managers are seen to have acquired far more wealth and power than their legal status would suggest and, along with other “brazen servants,” participated in the bondservant uprisings in the T'ai-hu basin during the late Ming and early Ch'ing.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference76 articles.
1. Wo tui-yü Ming-tai chung-ch'i i-hou ku-yung lao-tung ti tsai jen-shih;I-ling;LSYC,1963
2. Ming-tai ti wang-fu chuang-t'ien;Yü-ch'üan;LSLT,1964
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Rewriting Bondage: Literacy and Slavery in a Qing Native Domain;Comparative Studies in Society and History;2021-01
2. Index;The Making of a New Rural Order in South China;2020-06-30
3. Bibliography;The Making of a New Rural Order in South China;2020-06-30
4. Conclusion;The Making of a New Rural Order in South China;2020-06-30
5. Huizhou House Firms;The Making of a New Rural Order in South China;2020-06-30