Abstract
The open rule in the House is a complex set of restrictions, limiting, for example, the number of motions and the order of recognition. By incorporating constraints based on the actual set of rules into a model, I show that legislative outcomes appear more predictable than was previously thought. These rules nearly always allow the proponents of legislation to respond to an opponent's amendment, mitigating the potential damage of the latter. An advantage of the approach is that it provides a new interpretation of the changes in floor activity observed in the postreform period.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Amendment Politics and Agenda Setting: A Theory with Evidence from the US House of Representatives1;The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization;2018-01-10
2. Legislative success in open sky congresses: weak gatekeeping prerogatives and the loss of majority support;The Journal of Legislative Studies;2016-01-02
3. Lawmaking;Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences;2015-05-15
4. A Theory of Competitive Partisan Lawmaking;Political Science Research and Methods;2015-01-30
5. Decisions and Organizations;Law, Governance and Technology Series;2014-10-16