Abstract
Abstract
Abstract objects are standardly taken to be causally inert, however principled arguments for this claim are rarely given. As a result, a number of recent authors have claimed that abstract objects are causally efficacious. These authors take abstracta to be temporally located in order to enter into causal relations but lack a spatial location. In this paper, I argue that such a position is untenable by showing first that causation requires its relata to have a temporal location, but second, that if an entity is temporally located then it is spatiotemporally located since this follows from the theory of Relativity. Since abstract objects lack a spatiotemporal location, then if something is causally efficacious, it is not abstract.
Reference46 articles.
1. Armstrong, David. 1989. Universals: An Opinionated Introduction (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
2. Azzouni, Jody. 2008. “A Cause for Concern: Standard Abstracta and Causation,” Philosophia Mathematica, vol. 3, no. 16, pp. 397–401.
3. Balaguer, Mark. 1998. Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
4. Baron, Sam and Kristie Miller. 2015. “Causation sans Time,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 27–40.
5. Benacerraf, Paul. 1983. “Mathematical Truth,” in Philosophy of Mathematics (2nd edition), ed. Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 403–420.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献