Author:
Poole Keith T.,Rosenthal Howard,Koford Kenneth
Abstract
Two related issues have developed in the scale analysis of voting in the U. S. Congress. One is methodological; it concerns the appropriate dimensionalizing model. The other is more substantive, entailing interpretation of the extent to which voting dimensions carry an ideological component. Kenneth Koford contributed to consideration of these issues in his research note, “Dimensions in Congressional Voting,” in the September 1989 issue of this Review. In this controversy, his claims are challenged vigorously by Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal. In turn, Koford defends his argument that “much roll call voting in Congress does not fit a single dimension.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference48 articles.
1. Poole Keith , Sowell Fallaw B. , and Spear Stephen E. N.d. “Evaluating Dimensionality in Spatial Voting Models.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling. Forthcoming.
2. Constraint in European party activists' sympathy scores for interest groups.
3. Snyder James . N.d. “Committee Power, Structure-induced Equilibria, and Roll-Call Votes.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.
4. Evaluating Theories of Congressional Roll-Call Voting
5. Analysis of Congressional Coalition Patterns: A Unidimensional Spatial Model
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献