Abstract
Recent accounts of genre have asserted that all texts participate in multiple genres and that genre works as a kind of contract between writers and readers. In the legal history of eighteenth-century British prosecutions for obscene libel and the reception history of gothic fiction at the turn of the nineteenth century, however, the model of genre as contract breaks down. At the end of the eighteenth century, several texts we now call gothic faced threatened prosecution under existing obscene libel laws. The reception histories of the fiction of Matthew Lewis, Charlotte Dacre, and Charles Robert Maturin demonstrate that public denouncements and threatened prosecution forced gothic texts, even as they theoretically participated in at least one genre, to belong to a legal category (obscenity) for which their writers never intended them.
Publisher
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
60 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ‘I bet you like looking at that asshole, dontcha?’: Jeff Stryker’s enigmatic sexuality;Porn Studies;2024-07-02
2. The Goths in Ancient History;The Cambridge History of the Gothic;2020-08-31
3. Introduction: The Gothic in/and History;The Cambridge History of the Gothic;2020-08-31
4. Index;The Cambridge History of the Gothic;2020-08-31
5. Select Bibliography;The Cambridge History of the Gothic;2020-08-31