Abstract
Has the organization of commercial agriculture in the Third World been shaped primarily by external forces from the world economy? This study of sugar production in northern and western India shows that industrialists were generally unable to impose a plantation system on the local peasantry, despite the great technical and economic advantages of doing so. Control of the land, in most cases, did not pass into the hands of industrialists. The organization of crop production remained almost unchanged in the north, while in the west, despite initial progress toward a plantation system, the local cultivators responded by taking control of the industry into their own hands. Thus, contrary to experience in much of the New World, Indian villagers did not become passive victims of the sugar industry; those in the west went even further, in taking over the industry themselves. The contrast between these regions can be explained in part by the temporary existence of an “irrigation frontier” in the west.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference58 articles.
1. Attwood Donald W. 1980. “Irrigation and Imperialism: The Impact of Irrigation on Economic Growth and Social Inequality in Western India.” Paper presented at the Harvard Institute for International Development, 18 April. Mimeographed.
2. Patrons and Mobilizers: Political Entrepreneurs in an Agrarian State
3. Belapur Company Ltd. 1956. “Souvenir Brochure to Mark the Occasion of the Visit to Harigaon of the Delegates to the Ninth Congress of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists.” Bombay: G. Claridge.
4. Peasants and capitalists in Northern India: Kisans in the cane commodity circuit in Gorakhpur in the 1930s
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献