Abstract
Abstract
In recent years there has been an explosion of philosophical work on blame. Much of this work has focused on explicating the nature of blame or on examining the norms that govern it, and the primary motivation for theorizing about blame seems to derive from blame’s tight connection to responsibility. However, very little philosophical attention has been given to praise and its attendant practices. In this paper, I identify three possible explanations for this lack of attention. My goal is to show that each of these lines of thought is mistaken and to argue that praise is deserving of careful, independent analysis by philosophers interested in theorizing about responsibility.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Hazards;The Architecture of Blame and Praise;2024-10-10
2. Functions;The Architecture of Blame and Praise;2024-10-10
3. Asymmetries;The Architecture of Blame and Praise;2024-10-10
4. Introduction;The Architecture of Blame and Praise;2024-10-10
5. List of Tables;The Architecture of Blame and Praise;2024-10-10