Abstract
The work of Ted Robert Gurr, Chalmers Johnson, Neil Smelser, Samuel P. Huntington, and Charles Tilly has dominated the recent study of revolutions. However, Jeffrey Paige, Ellen Kay Trimberger, S. N. Eisenstadt, and Theda Skocpol have lately produced theories of revolution that are far better grounded historically than those in earlier works. Five major points were neglected by earlier theorists: (1) the variable goals and structures of states; (2) the systematic intrusion of international pressures on the domestic political and economic organization of societies; (3) the structure of peasant communities; (4) the coherence or weakness of the armed forces; and (5) the variables affecting elite behavior. Starting from these points, Paige, Trimberger, Eisenstadt, and Skocpol have produced analyses of the causes and outcomes of a variety of revolutions. Yet significant challenges to the theory of revolutions—such as extending the range of cases analyzed, clarifying the grounds of peasant behavior, and tying theoretical analysis to demographic data—still remain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference61 articles.
1. “Patterns and Types of Social-Economic Revolution in Greece from the Fourth to the Second Century B.C.,”;Fuks;Ancient Society,1974
Cited by
153 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Interviews;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
2. Conclusion;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
3. Syria and Saudi Arabia;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
4. The People Overthrew the Regimes;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25
5. Bringing Identity Back in the “Arab Uprisings”;Revolutionary Emotions;2024-10-25