Abstract
Empirical research has demonstrated the utility of an interest group approach for the study of Soviet politics, as well as for interpreting the politics of tsarist Russia and Eastern European communist systems and the dissident movements. The flowering of group activity in Poland and Czechoslovakia at certain times and the activity of dissent movements show, however, the rudimentary character of “normal” interest groups in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. Although the Soviet system has changed since Stalin's death, it remains fundamentally authoritarian in character. The use of models, such as totalitarian, authoritarian, bureaucratic, corporatist, and pluralist, hinders rather than facilitates an understanding of Soviet politics and of the place of interest groups in that system.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Future acts of past forgetting Symbolism, political consciousness, and ethno-nationalism in Korean reunification;ROUTLEDGE STUD THINK;2022
2. Lobbyist;The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs;2022
3. Development of lobbying in Russia: pre-revolutionary and Soviet periods;Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science;2021-11-19
4. Lobbyist;The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs;2020
5. The development of an interest group system in a constrained democracy: Montenegro;Journal of Public Affairs;2018-11-19