Abstract
Few propositions about international law have enjoyed more support
than the proposition that, under the Charter of the United Nations, the use of force by way of reprisals is illegal. Although, indeed, the words “reprisals” and “retaliation ” are not to be found in the Charter, this proposition was generally regarded by writers2 and by the Security Council as the logical and necessary consequence of the prohibition of force in Article 2(4), the injunction to settle disputes peacefully in Article 2(3) and the limiting of permissible force by states to self-defense. The U.N. Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States, adopted by General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) on October 24, 1970, contains the following categorical statement: “States have a duty to refrain from acts of reprisal involving the use of force.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference3 articles.
1. The Limits of Perceptual Objectivity in International Peace Observation;Franck;The Middle-East Crisis: Test of International Law, 33 Law and Contemporary Problems,1965
2. The Beirut Raid and the International Double Standard. A Reply to Professor Richard A. Falk;Blum,1970
3. New Israel Strategy Seen in Raid Near Damascus;Feron;New York Times,1969
Cited by
132 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献