Abstract
Scholars use a variety of terms to refer to the regimes of the former Soviet bloc. Some prefercommunist, while others usesocialistorstate socialist. In this article, Andrew Roberts argues thatcommunismis the better choice. Usingsocialismorstate socialismto refer to these regimes stretches the concept unnecessarily, making one label refer to two regimes with little in common. This conceptual stretching has two negative consequences. First, it impedes efficient scholarly communication. Second, it impoverishes political debate by diminishing the achievements of democratic socialists. A solution to this problem is to use the termcommunistto refer to Soviet-style regimes.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Cultural Studies
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献