Abstract
Abstract
While the Value-Free Ideal of science has suffered compelling criticism, some advocates like Gregor Betz continue to argue that science policy advisors should avoid value judgments by hedging their hypotheses. This approach depends on a mistaken understanding of the relations between facts and values in regulatory science. My case study involves the morning-after pill Plan B and the “Drug Fact” that it “may” prevent implantation. I analyze the operative values, which I call zygote-centrism, responsible for this hedged drug label. Then, I explain my twofold account of value-ladenness, involving the constitutive role of value judgments in science and the social function of facts as political tools. Because this drug fact is ineliminably value-laden in both senses, I conclude that hedged hypotheses are not necessarily value-free.
Reference112 articles.
1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. “Emergency Oral Contraception.” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 56, no. 3 (1997): 290-97.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. “The Limits of Conscientious Refusal in Reproductive Medicine: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385.” Obstetrics & Gynecology 110, no. 5 (2007; reaffirmed 2016): 1203-08.
3. Anderson, Douglas M., ed. Mosby’s Medical, Nursing & Allied Health Dictionary. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2002.
4. Annas, George J. “Pregnant Women as Fetal Containers.” Hastings Center Report 16, no. 6 (1986): 13-14.
5. Armstrong, Elizabeth M. Conceiving Risk, Bearing Responsibility: Fetal Alcohol Syndrome & the Diagnosis of Moral Disorder. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献