Author:
Lavely William,Wong R. Bin
Abstract
Ever since malthus, it has been conventional to cast the Chinese and European preindustrial demographic systems as opposing archetypes—Europe as a model of demographic restraint, China as demographic profligate. Europe's moderate population growth, fertility control keyed to economic conditions, and favorable living standards are contrasted with China's rapid growth, periodic mortality crises, and precarious balance of population and resources. Although there is some variation in approaches and vocabularies reflecting disciplinary divisions, and recognition of the substantial variability of institutions within Europe and China, this stylized contrast continues to flourish in the demographic and historical literatures. Its persistence is important because Malthusian dynamics underlie a popular and persuasive set of explanations for the divergent paths of Chinese and European economies and societies in the industrial era. In this article we challenge this conventional dichotomy and its empirical underpinnings.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference136 articles.
1. “Effects of Government Intervention on Population Growth in Imperial China.”;Linong;Journal of Family History,1993
2. “Deliberate Birth Control under a High Fertility Regime: Reproductive Behavior in China before 1970.”;Zhongwei;Population and Development Review,1997
3. “Life Tables for a Southern Chinese Family from 1365 to 1849.”;I-Chin;Human Biology,1931
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献