Abstract
Abstract
Many scholars have rejected cultural evolutionary theory on the grounds that cultural variation is directed and intentionally created, rather than incremental and blind with respect to function, as is the case for novel genetic variation in genetic evolution. Meanwhile, some cultural evolution researchers insist that cultural variation is blind and undirected, and the only directional force is selection of randomly-generated variants. Here I argue that neither of these positions are tenable. Cultural variation is directed in various ways. While this does not invalidate cultural evolution, more attention should be paid to the different sources of non-randomness in culturally evolving systems.
Reference68 articles.
1. Acerbi, Alberto, and Alex Mesoudi. 2015. “If We Are All Cultural Darwinians What’s the Fuss about? Clarifying Recent Disagreements in the Field of Cultural Evolution,” Biology & Philosophy, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 481–503.
2. Atran, Scott. 2001. “The Trouble with Memes: Inference versus Imitation in Cultural Creation,” Human Nature, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 351–381.
3. Barrett, H. Clark, and James Broesch. 2012. “Prepared Social Learning about Dangerous Animals in Children,” Evolution and Human Behavior, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 499–508.
4. Barrett, H. Clark, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby. 2007. “The Hominid Entry into the Cognitive Niche,” in Evolution of Mind, ed. Stephen W. Gangestad and Jeffrey A. Simpson (New York City, NY: Guilford), pp. 241–248.
5. Basalla, George. 1988. The Evolution of Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献