Abstract
Academic writing on the post-Mao reforms—as indeed on almost every other aspect of China since 1949—has been largely in the hands of social scientists. Much of this writing, moreover, has been done either explicitly or implicitly from a systemic perspective. That is, it seeks to understand the reform process as unfolding within a particular kind of social, economic, and political system and to infer from other reform attempts in comparable systems something about the course the Chinese reforms are likely to take. When Chalmers Johnson (1982) applies the “Leninist government paradigm” to the Chinese case and makes certain observations about the potential for “peaceful structural change” within societies that conform to this paradigm, he is operating from the systemic perspective.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. China's 20th-Century Political Economic Evolution;The Evolution of China’s Political Economy;2023-03-30
2. Between practical and liberal statecraft: Guo Songtao and his political and economic ideas;Journal of Modern Chinese History;2021-07-03
3. Index;Mao's Third Front;2020-05-31
4. Bibliography;Mao's Third Front;2020-05-31
5. Appendix: Third Front Demographics;Mao's Third Front;2020-05-31