Abstract
The Alien Tort Statute, originally enacted as section 9 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, grants the district courts original jurisdiction over “any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.” In 1980 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit breathed new life into these little-used and somewhat mysterious provisions. The case was Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, in which a Paraguayan family brought suit against a former Paraguayan police chief for the torture and death of one of its members. The court upheld federal jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute. Finding state torture to be a violation of “modern international law,” it pronounced itself willing to enforce this law even as between aliens whenever personal jurisdiction could be obtained over the defendant.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Cited by
70 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Influencing Enforcement: The Application of International Law in Independent Judiciaries—The Case of the Alien Tort Statute;Political Research Quarterly;2023-06-23
2. Transnational Corporations and Human Rights;2020-08-20
3. Index;Transnational Corporations and Human Rights;2020-08-20
4. Select Bibliography;Transnational Corporations and Human Rights;2020-08-20
5. Conclusion;Transnational Corporations and Human Rights;2020-08-20