Abstract
Abstract
This paper offers an account of a phenomenon that seems increasingly common in public discourse: trolling. The term “troll” is colloquial, and no formal synonym exists in English. But the informality of the term should not mislead us into thinking that the underlying concept is so unimportant as to be unworthy of philosophical attention or so ill-behaved as to be resistant to philosophical analysis. This paper presents such an analysis.
Reference41 articles.
1. Barney, Rachel. “[Aristotle], On Trolling.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2, no. 2 (2016): 193–95.
2. Boudourides, Moses A. “Social and Psychological Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Paper presented at 2nd Workshop Conference “Neties’ 95,” October 12–13, 1995, Greece, http://www.duth.gr/cmboudour/mab/csi.html (accessed February 26, 2005).
3. Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
4. Cheng, Justin, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. “Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions.” CSCW: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, February 3, 2017, 1217–30.
5. Coons, Christian, and Michael Weber. Manipulation: Theory and Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献