Abstract
The author questions the assumptions of an “Asian school of scarcity and risk,” of which James C. Scott is the principal exponent, using Bengali peasant history as a case in point. He argues that it is more likely that the subsistence traditions of Bengal derive from locally generated values of abundance and indulgence than from a universal “moral economy” and suggests that detailed accounts of subsistence traditions in other parts of Asia will confound attempts to prove that European experience is a reliable guide to Asian practices.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference32 articles.
1. Waheeduzzaman A. M. 1969. “Land Resumption in Bengal (1819–1846).” Ph.D. dissertation, University of London.
2. THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
3. Loans as a Part of Agrarian Relations. Some Results of a Preliminary Survey in West Bengal;Rudra;Economic and Political Weekly,1975
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献