Author:
Gillespie Diane,Rosamond Sally,Thomas Elizabeth
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This qualitative study examined students' descriptions of their experiences in classroom groups in an interdisciplinary arts and sciences program. Using a grounded theory approach, we found that students used descriptive names to navigate complex group demands. Their reductionist strategies interfered with learning, prevented flexibility, and pointed to small group fatigue.
Reference33 articles.
1. Abrami, P. C. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
2. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1997). The ubiquity and potency of labeling in organizations. Organization Science, 8, 43–58.
3. Augoustinos, M., & Innes, J. M. (1990). Towards an integration of social representations and social schemata theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 213–231.
4. Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Silver, W. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23, 467–488.
5. Becker, H. S. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献