Author:
Flanigan Jessica,Greven Alec
Abstract
Abstract
University administrators should not enforce speech codes because speech codes are generally counterproductive to a university’s educational mission. In making the case against campus speech codes, we consider and reply to four of the most prominent arguments in favor of restricting student speech. These arguments appeal to the values of harm prevention, inclusive education, relational equality, and the overall promotion of free speech. We show that speech restrictions do not effectively promote these values. We conclude that campus administrators should uphold protections for freedom of expression on college campuses in order to promote a more egalitarian and inclusive learning environment.
Reference57 articles.
1. Agarwal, Pooja K., and Patrice M. Bain. Powerful Teaching: Unleash the Science of Learning. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2019.
2. Altman, Andrew. “Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination.” Ethics 103, no. 2 (1993): 302–17.
3. Amherst College. “Reporting and Responding to Bias: A Handbook.”https://www.amherst.edu/amherst-story/diversity/for-students-faculty-staff/bias-reporting/bias-reporting-handbook (accessed August 9, 2021).
4. Anderson, Elizabeth. “Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective.” Ethics 117, no. 4 (2007): 595–622.
5. Anderson, Greta. “Conservative Student Groups Say Process for Official Recognition Risks Viewpoint Discrimination.” Inside Higher Ed, January 23, 2020. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/01/23/conservative-student-groups-sayprocess-official-recognition-risks-viewpoint.