Abstract
Few archaeologists would dispute the suggestion that the introduction of 14C dating into archaeological research has had a profound influence on the way in which prehistoric studies are conducted. Glyn Daniel, for example, has gone so far as to rank the development of the 14C method in the twentieth-century with the discovery of the antiquity of the human species in the nineteenth-century (Daniel 1967:266). Despite the widespread acknowledgment of the significant role played by the 14C method in contemporary archaeological investigations, no comprehensive, critical, historical review of the specific intellectual history and substantive characteristics of this impact, particularly in American archaeology, has been published.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Museology,Archeology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),History
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Report on new tree-ring-radiocarbon dates from Snaketown, Gila River Indian Community;Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports;2024-04
2. Archaeology as History;2023-07-26
3. Archaeobotany: Plant Domestication;Reference Module in Social Sciences;2023
4. Taylor, R. E. (Erv);Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology;2020
5. Taylor, R. E. (Erv);Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology;2018