Abstract
The fine modern scholarship on Athenian law has concentrated on (a) the scope of particular laws, and (b) the technical aspects of the legal process. This paper attempts to examine how the legal system worked in practice.The Athenians classified legal cases in various ways. On the one hand there was a division by subject matter between private cases (dikai idiai) and public cases (dikai dēmosiai), and on the other there was a division according to the procedure involved. There were a number of specialised procedures, but the most important procedural division was between those cases which anyone was free to bring (graphai) and those which only an interested party could bring (dikai in the narrow sense). These divisions on grounds of subject matter and on grounds of procedure overlap, but they are distinct and neither corresponds to the modern European legal division between civil and criminal cases.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Archaeology,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Language and Linguistics,Archaeology,Classics
Cited by
152 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Wasps;A Companion to Aristophanes;2024-03-08
2. The citizen body;Citizenship in Antiquity;2023-06-02
3. L’art du droit dans la Rhétorique d’Aristote;Archives de philosophie du droit;2023-05-22
4. The Connection Between Socio-Economic and Political Elite;From Deliberative Democracy to Consent Democracy;2023
5. Realized Choices: Public Finances as a Reflection of Athenian Self-Understanding;From Deliberative Democracy to Consent Democracy;2023