Author:
Chamberlin John R.,Courant Paul N.
Abstract
The development of social choice theory over the past three decades has brought many new insights into democratic theory. Surprisingly, the theory of representation has gone almost untouched by social choice theorists. This article redresses this neglect and provides an axiomatic study of one means of implementing proportional representation.The distinguishing feature of proportional representation is its concern for the representativeness of deliberations as well as decisions. We define a representative in a way that is particularly attentive to this feature and then define a method of selecting representatives (a variant of the Borda rule) which selects a maximally representative body. We also prove that this method of selection meets four social choice axioms that are met by a number of other important social choice functions (including pairwise majority decision and the Borda rule).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
158 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Price of Justified Representation;ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation;2024-09-06
2. Forms of new democracy;Social Choice and Welfare;2024-03-27
3. Optimized Distortion and Proportional Fairness in Voting;ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation;2024-03-11
4. A comparison of sequential ranked-choice voting and single transferable vote;Journal of Computational Social Science;2024-03-11
5. Deliberation and Voting in Approval-Based Multi-winner Elections;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2024