Abstract
As long as legal scholarship focused on traditional sources that were considered“distinctively legal,” a great variety of “legal texts” were consigned to scholars in other disciplines. Thus, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1841–1932) and his classic workThe Common Law(1881) appeared safely inside the categorical “box” identified as distinctively legal, while Louis Calhern's portrayal of Holmes and the filmThe Magnificent Yankee(MGM, 1950) fell outside.In recent years, however, both the inside/outside distinction and the legal box metaphor have become increasingly suspect. Drawing upon post-structuralist theories, which highlight the discursive and representational dimensions of law, a variety of different projects seek to locate the diverse places at which legal rhetoric and imagery are constituted.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference105 articles.
1. The Case of the Juridical Junkie: Perry Mason and the Dilemma of Confession;Sokolsky;Yale Journal of Law and Humanities,1990
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. ‘I Just Want to Talk…’: Liberalism, Generative Unanimity, and Post-sacrificial Scapegoating in 12 Angry Men;Rene Girard, Law, Literature, and Cinema;2024
2. Cinema and Law;Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy;2023
3. Law and Cinema;Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy;2020
4. Spricht Volkes Stimme Recht?;Komplexe Freiheit;2016-10-22
5. The Narrative Dimension;Computer Applications for Handling Legal Evidence, Police Investigation and Case Argumentation;2011-10-24