Abstract
Purpose: Mapping the theoretical framework of publications on Open Innovation (OI) and Co-innovation regarding the concept of value and synthesizing the literature on Co-innovation, seeking the flow of contributions and proposing a research agenda.
Design/Methodology/Approach: A bibliometric analysis and integrative review was carried out through articles, reviews and conference articles published in international databases according to Prado et al. (2016) and Torraco (2016).
Originality: Studies have revisited, refined and criticized OI over the years, whose theoretical field has advanced and debated the emergence of new concepts, such as Co-innovation. However, the discussion about how this new paradigm emerges and dialogues with OI and can be considered an evolutionary theme is still lacking in the literature.
Results: Although publications and temporal trends on Co-innovation have shown to be promising, the highlighted authors did not present temporal extension of their productions and the field is still in constant oscillations. Despite the streams of contributions with important scope in the construction of the paradigm, the theme still needs epistemological discussions for theoretical consolidation.
Theoretical and methodological contributions: This study contributes to epistemological advances on OI and stimulates reflection for discussions and development of contemporary approaches to innovation.
Management contributions: This research presents dimensions and stages of Co-innovation processes with elements that impact its practice. Furthermore, it sheds light on the importance of selecting partners (identifying different actors and their roles in the co-creation process) and establishing adequate mechanisms to encourage client participation.
Reference70 articles.
1. Abdulkader, B., Magni, D., Cillo, V., Papa, A. and Micera, R. (2020). Aligning firm's value system and open innovation: a new framework of business process management beyond the business model innovation", Business Process Management Journal, 26(5), 999-1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2020-0231
2. Abhari, K., Davidson, E.J. and Xiao, B. (2017a). Co-innovation platform affordances: Developing a conceptual model and measurement instrument", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(5), 873-895. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2016-0156
3. Abhari, K., Davidson, E.J. and Xiao, B. (2017b). Perceived Individual Risk of Co-innovation in Collaborative Innovation Networks. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41254
4. Abhari, K., Davidson, E.J. and Xiao, B. (2017c). Co-innovation Experience in Social Product Development Networks: Construct Development and Measurement Validation. AMCIS 2017 Proceedings. 2. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2017/Openness/Presentations/2
5. Abhari, K.; Davidson, E. J.; & Xiao, B. (2018). A risk worth taking? The effects of risk and prior experience on co-innovation participation. Internet Research, 28 (3), 804-828. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2017-0196