Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Author:
Son Ji1ORCID, Lin Heather Y.2, Fu Siqing3, Biter Amadeo B.3, Dumbrava Ecaterina E.3, Karp Daniel D.3, Naing Aung3, Pant Shubham3, Piha-Paul Sarina A.3, Rodon Jordi3, Subbiah Vivek3, Tsimberidou Apostolia M.3, Yap Timothy A.3, Frumovitz Michael M.1, Jazaeri Amir A.1, Ramirez Pedro T.1, Westin Shannon N.1, Yuan Ying2, Meric-Bernstam Funda3, Hong David S.3
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA 2. 2 Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA 3. 3 Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Introduction
We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials.
Methods
Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed.
Results
We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20–74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1–7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0–5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0–10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; p = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; p < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; p = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; p = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases.
Conclusion
Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
Publisher
Innovative Healthcare Institute
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference32 articles.
1. Siegel
RL,
Miller
KD,
Fuchs
HE,
Jemal
A.
Cancer statistics, 2022.
CA Cancer J Clin.
2022;
72:
7–
33. 2. Moore
DH,
Tian
C,
Monk
BJ,
Long
HJ,
et al.
Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.
Gynecol Oncol.
2010;
116:
44–
49. 3. Waggoner
SE.
Cervical cancer.
Lancet.
2003;
361:
2217–
2225. 4. Tewari
KS,
Sill
MW,
Long
HJ,
et al.
Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer.
N Engl J Med.
2014;
370:
734–
743. 5. Muggia
FM,
Blessing
JA,
Method
M,
et al.
Evaluation of vinorelbine in persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Gynecol Oncol.
2004;
92:
639–
643.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|