Prinsip In Absensia Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Due Process of Law

Author:

Atapary Adolf Erens,Pasalbessy John Dirk,Wadjo Hadibah Zachra

Abstract

Introduction: Courts in absentia in corruption have been pros and cons to date, there is an assumption that court in absentia is a violation of human rights because it is related to the human rights of the accused as a human being who has the right to defend himself in court, on the other hand The trial in absentia can be carried out as long as the whereabouts of the defendant are not known at all so that he cannot be presented at the trial trial due to running away (fugitive). Purposes of the Research:  This writing aims to analyze and explain the existence of justice in absentia in the implementation of the criminal justice system in Indonesia in accordance with the principle of due process of law, to analyze and discuss the nature of the principle of due process of law in ensuring legal certainty and justice in the examination of criminal cases. Methods of the Research: Normative research method with the type of research is qualitative analysis. The problem approach used is the statute approach, the conceptual approach and the case approach. The sources of legal materials used are Primary legal materials, Secondary legal materials, and Tertiary legal materials and are used as a technique for collecting legal materials, then processing and analyzing legal materials through methods of interpretation, harmonization, systematic and legal discovery. Results of the Research: The results of the study indicate that the judiciary in absentia can be implemented and does not violate human rights as long as it is implemented through the correct procedure and based on the provisions of the law. The trial in absentia aims to break the deadlock in the examination of defendants who are not present at the trial and efforts to save state finances, both those that have been corrupted and those that are still suspected of being related to corruption cases, both those that have been confiscated and those that have not been confiscated to be confiscated for the State through a court decision.

Publisher

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura

Reference15 articles.

1. Andi Hamzah, Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Pengembangan, disampaikan pada Seminar Kejahatan Korporasi, Kerjasama ASPEHUPIKI dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 1989.

2. Barda Nawawi Arief, Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1998.

3. Darwis Tirande, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua, and Elsa Rina Maya Toule. 2022. "Kriminologis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Desa". PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 (2), 133-50. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6435.

4. Erwin Ubwarin dan Alfian Reymon Makaruku, Bendahara Daerah dan Korupsi Pengelolaan Dana Daerah, Jurnal Belo, Vol 7, No 1, Agustus 2021.

5. Jimmly Assiddiqie, "Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia", trial::http://www. docudesk.com.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3