Understanding Aesthetic Experiences of Architectural Students in Vertical and Horizontal Campuses

Author:

Bostancı SedaORCID,Akdağ Suzan GirginkayaORCID

Abstract

The typological features of university campus areas are shaped according to their locations in the city. Campuses in city centers carry great potentials for students’ cultural, intellectual and artistic activities, especially for those from faculty of architecture and design, with close relations to the city. The aim of this paper is to develop an approach for measuring architecture students’ aesthetic experience of vertical and horizontal campuses in relation to sense of place theory. Recently, emerging technologies in cognitive science, such as brain imaging techniques, activity maps, sensory maps, cognitive mapping and photo-projective method etc., have enabled advanced measurement of aesthetic experience. In this exploratory research, using ‘photo-projective method’, students will be asked to interpret and draw ‘cognitive maps’ of the places that they are happy to be (defined place) or to see (landscape) on the campus. Based on students’ impressions and experiences, it will be possible to compare aesthetic experience on vertical and horizontal campus. Thus, a comprehensive approach for improving campus design according to users’ aesthetic experiences and sense of place rather than building technology, law, development and finance-driven obligations will be introduced.

Publisher

Alanya Hamdullah Emin Pasa Universitesi

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science

Reference37 articles.

1. Altman, I., Low, S. M. (1992). Place Attachment (Human Behavior and Environment), Springer. https://books.google.com.tr/books/about/Place_Attachment.html?id=18TQoAEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

2. Berlyne, D. E. (1974). The New Experimental Aesthetics. Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. Hemisphere, Oxford, England. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1975-07344-000

3. Bergin, C., Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0

4. Bradley, M. M., Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9

5. 5 Bostancı, S.H. (2019). Cognitive Studies in Urban Design, in New Approaches to Spatial Planning and Design, (ed. Özyavuz, M.), Peter Lang; Germany. https://doi.org/10.3726/b15609

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3