Corrective Feedback: How has it been implemented in EFL Writing Class?

Author:

Megawati Fika,Kadarisman A. Effendi,Agustina Sheila

Abstract

Studies have shown that during the process of Interlanguage development, language learners cannot avoid making grammatical errors in either spoken or written form. Although it is considered as a normal phase, errors can lower students' confidence to be active EFL learners in the class. Accordingly, they need teachers’ appropriate corrective feedback (CF) to produce effective communication in the target language. Thus, considering the significant contribution of grammar knowledge and teachers' feedback on students' English proficiency, this paper aims to explore the perception of 12 EFL teachers’ practices and 91 students, both of whom are involved in an English writing class, about CF. The instruments used to collect the data was closed- and open-ended questionnaire. The results indicate that teachers vary their CF in terms of frequency and types. In addition, students show a different perspective on the effectiveness of CF in writing class. Also, teachers need to become more familiar with electronic CF in order to implement it better in class including for writing instruction process and promoting peer corrective feedback. In line with these findings, suggestions for future research are provided.

Publisher

Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes

Reference37 articles.

1. Alharbi, M. A. (2020). Exploring the potential of Google Doc in facilitating innovative teaching and learning practices in an EFL writing course. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1572157

2. Alshuraidah, A., & Storch, N. (2019). Investigating a collaborative approach to peer feedback. Academic.Oup.Com, 73(2), 166–174. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/73/2/166/5364008

3. Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquee, 13(2), 95–127.

4. Ariyanti, A., & Nur, D. R. (2017). Correcting Feedback on Essay Composition: EFL Students’ Preferences between Traditional and e-Feedback. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 2(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v2i3.73

5. Atma, N., & Widiati, N. (2016). Efl students’ preferences for corrective feedback in speaking instruction across speaking course levels. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 43(2), 183–195. Retrieved from http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jbs/article/view/194

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3