FARKLI COVİD-19 PANDEMİ YÖNETİMİ MODELLERİ VE MODELLERİN ULUSLARARASI KABULLERİ: ÇİN VE GÜNEY KORE ÖRNEKLERİ

Author:

DEMİR Emre1ORCID,ÇELİK Hatice2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. TED ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has presented an extraordinary and unprecedented situation. Countries worldwide have been trying to find the most effective solutions to end the pandemic. Different approaches to combat the virus have emerged. Among these, China has become the prime example of an authoritarian model of virus management, whereas South Korea managed to slow down the pandemic with a liberal approach. The two countries, albeit both highly successful in pandemic management, have different and even contrasting images in the international area. This study analyzes how China’s and Korea’s pandemic management models and their international reception differ from each other. While both models were largely applauded domestically, in the international sphere, China, after early acclaim, ended up with a more negative and controversial image, whereas South Korea created a relatively more positively regarded model. Still, compared to the Korean model, the Chinese model was emulated and implemented by many more countries worldwide.

Publisher

Pamukkale University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference72 articles.

1. Bae, Y. (2016). “Ideas, Interests and Practical Authority in Reform Politics: Decentralization Reform in South Korea in the 2000s”, Asian Journal of Political Science, 24/1, 63-86.

2. BBC (2020a). Coronavirus: China Says Disease ‘Curbed’ in Wuhan and Hubei. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51813876.

3. BBC (2020b). Coronavirus: Trump Moves to Pull US Out of World Health Organization. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53327906.

4. BBC (2020c). Australia Accuses China of Undermining Trade Agreement. Retrieved April 17, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-55240898.

5. BBC (2020d). China Covid-19: How State Media and Censorship Took on Coronavirus. Retrieved April 12, 2021, from bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55355401.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3