Therapy intensification in high-risk neuroblastoma patients with poor response to standard induction: experience of Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Immunology
-
Published:2019-12-31
Issue:4
Volume:18
Page:19-28
-
ISSN:2414-9314
-
Container-title:Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Voprosy gematologii/onkologii i immunopatologii v pediatrii
Author:
Shamanskaya T. V.1ORCID, Kachanov D. Y.1ORCID, Dumacheva A. V.1, Teleshova M. V.1ORCID, Shevtcov D. V.2ORCID, Sergeeva T. V.1, Syleimanova A. M.2ORCID, Moiseenko R. A.1ORCID, Likar Y. N.1ORCID, Kailash .1ORCID, Varfolomeeva S. R.2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Dmitriy Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Immunology Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation 2. N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology оf the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Abstract
High-risk neuroblastoma (NB) is characterized by unsatisfactory treatment results and low probability of long-term survival despite the multimodal therapeutic approach (chemotherapy, surgical treatment, radiation therapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, etc.). One of the prognostic factors in this cohort of patients is the response to induction therapy. The article presents the experience of the intensification of induction therapy in 12 patients with high-risk NB with a poor response (mixed response, stable disease) to standard induction therapy who received treatment at Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, assessing its impact on the prognosis of the disease. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology. Patients received an additional two courses of chemotherapy with the inclusion of a type I topoisomerase inhibitor topotecan (TCE – topotecan, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). This regimen of intensification of therapy has demonstrated its feasibility. The main grade 3–4 toxicity was hematologic. An improvement in response was achieved in 5/12 (41.6%) patients. However, long-term results of therapy remained unsatisfactory. The 3-year EFS was 16.7% (95% CI 0.0–37.8), the 3-year OS was 50.0% (95% CI 21.7–78.3). Thus, the intensification of therapy in patients with high-risk NB with a poor response to standard induction therapy did not improve treatment outcomes.
Publisher
Fund Doctors, Innovations, Science for Children
Subject
Oncology,Hematology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference40 articles.
1. Goodman M.T., Gurney J.G., Smith M.A., Olsham A.F. Sympathetic nervous system tumors. In: Ries LAG, Smith MA, Gurney JG, et al, eds. Sancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975–1995. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute, 1999; 65–72. 2. Tolbert V.P., Matthay K.K. Neuroblastoma: clinical and biological approach to risk stratification and treatment. Cell Tissue Res 2018; 372 (2): 195–209. 3. Maris J.M., Hogarty M.D., Bagatell R., Cohn S.L. Neuroblastoma Lancet 2007; 369: 2106–20. 4. Wilson L.M., Draper G.J. Neuroblastoma, its natural history and prognosis: a study of 487 cases. Br Med J 1974; 3 (5926): 301–7. 5. Cotterill S.J., Pearson A.D., Pritchard J., Foot A.B., Roald B., Kohler J.A., Imeson J. Clinical prognostic factors in 1277 patients with neuroblastoma: results of The European Neuroblastoma Study Group 'Survey' 1982-1992. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36 (7): 901–8.
|
|