The efficacy of the TRK inhibitor entrectinib in patients with extracranial <i>NTRK</i> fusion-positive tumors
-
Published:2023-09-30
Issue:3
Volume:22
Page:104-120
-
ISSN:2414-9314
-
Container-title:Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Voprosy gematologii/onkologii i immunopatologii v pediatrii
Author:
Stradomskaya T. V.1ORCID, Suleymanova A. M.1ORCID, Konovalov D. M.1ORCID, Druy A. E.1ORCID, Panfyorova A. V.1ORCID, Preobrazhenskaya E. V.2ORCID, Andreeva N. A.2ORCID, Sagoyan G. B.2ORCID, Teleshova M. V.1ORCID, Smirnova L. A.1ORCID, Zacarinnaya O. S.1ORCID, Shamanskaya T. V.1ORCID, Grachev N. S.1ORCID, Rubanskaya M. V.3ORCID, Kirgizov K. I.3ORCID, Imyanitov E. N.2ORCID, Varfolomeeva S. R.3ORCID, Kachanov D. Yu.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation 2. National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Petrov of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation 3. N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Abstract
Somatic translocations involving the NTRK genes occur in 0.34–2.2% of all malignant neoplasms in children. TRK inhibitors whose efficacy has been demonstrated in prospective clinical studies expand treatment options for patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK gene rearrangements. The aim of our study was to summarize the first Russian experience with the use of the TRK inhibitor entrectinib in patients with extracranial NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors included in the compassionate use program. This study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Academic Council of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology. The study included 8 patients who had been treated at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology and the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology. The main criteria for inclusion in the compassionate use program were a confirmed rearrangement of either NTRK1/2/3 genes in a solid tumor in patients with unresectable disease for whom no effective standard systemic therapy was available, progressive or recurrent disease during therapy prescribed according to the established diagnosis, risk group and risk stratification criteria, and the infeasibility of non-mutilating radical surgery. The median age at diagnosis was 4.3 months (range 1.2–83.6). The male to female ratio was 1:1. The primary site distribution was as follows: head and neck (n = 6; 75%), chest wall (n = 1; 12.5%), pelvis (n = 1; 12.5%). None of the patients had regional lymph node involvement or distant metastases at diagnosis. The distribution by histology (according to histopathology reports) was as follows: infantile fibrosarcoma (n = 4; 50%), undifferentiated round cell sarcoma, low-grade (n = 1; 12.5%), undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma, high-grade (n = 1; 12.5%), NTRK-rearranged spindle cell sarcoma, low-grade (n = 1; 12.5%), spindle cell tumor associated with an NTRK rearrangement (n = 1; 12.5%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with a pan-Trk monoclonal antibody was performed in 7/8 (87.5%) patients. Pan-Trk IHC was positive in 4/7 (57%) patients. Rearrangements in the NTRK1 and NTRK3 genes were confirmed in all the patients. The final methods used for the detection of fusion transcripts were as follows: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (n = 4; 50%) and RNA-based next-generation sequencing (n = 4; 50%). NTRK1 and NTRK3 gene translocations were detected in 3/8 (37.5%) and 5/8 (62.5%) patients, respectively. The following fusion transcripts were identified: ETV6::NTRK3 (n = 4), DIP2C::NTRK3 (n = 1), TPR::NTRK1 (n = 1), TPM3::NTRK1 (n = 1), MYH10::NTRK1 (n = 1). One (12.5%) patient received entrectinib as first-line therapy, other patients (7/8, 87.5%) received entrectinib as secondor subsequent-line therapy. Three (37.5%) patients had undergone surgery before treatment with entrectinib: 2 had R2 resection, 1 had R0/R1 resection (resection margins were not evaluated). None of the patients received radiation therapy. The median duration of entrectinib therapy at the time of analysis was 11.8 months (range 2.3–20.1). Delayed surgery was performed in 2/8 patients; according to the histopathology reports, they achieved grade IV pathomorphosis. Three patients experienced adverse events during treatment with entrectinib. The median time to adverse events was 0.23 months (range 0.2–7.96). Three patients required temporary interruption in treatment to relieve symptoms, a subsequent dose reduction by one dose level was necessary when resuming therapy in two patients. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 19.5 months (range 14.9–75.0). All the patients included in our analysis were alive, three of them had no radiologic evidence of disease. Fifty percent of the patients completed targeted therapy, another 50% of the patients continued treatment with entrectinib. Complete and very good partial response was achieved in 3/8 and 2/8 patients, respectively. Partial response, minor partial response and stable disease were observed in one patient each. These results indicate high efficacy and safety of entrectinib in pediatric patients with extracranial NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Further studies are needed to determine the therapeutic potential of TRK inhibitors in the treatment of different solid malignant neoplasms in children and to assess long-term treatment results.
Publisher
Fund Doctors, Innovations, Science for Children
Subject
Oncology,Hematology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference52 articles.
1. Okamura R., Boichard A., Kato S., Sicklick J.K., Bazhenova L., Kurzrock R. Analysis of NTRK Alterations in Pan-Cancer Adult and Pediatric Malignancies: Implications for NTRK-Targeted Therapeutics. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2018: PO.18.00183. DOI: 10.1200/PO.18.00183 2. Westphalen C.B., Krebs M.G., Le Tourneau C., Sokol E.S., Maund S.L., Wilson T.R., et al. Genomic context of NTRK1/2/3 fusion-positive tumours from a large real-world population. NPJ Precis Oncol 2021; 5 (1): 69. DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00206-y 3. Zhao X., Kotch C., Fox E., Surrey L.F., Wertheim G.B., Baloch Z.W., et al. NTRK Fusions Identified in Pediatric Tumors: The Frequency, Fusion Partners, and Clinical Outcome. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 1: PO.20.00250. DOI: 10.1200/PO.20.00250 4. Amatu A., Sartore-Bianchi A., Siena S. NTRK gene fusions as novel targets of cancer therapy across multiple tumour types. ESMO Open 2016; 1 (2): e000023. DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2015-000023 5. Cocco E., Scaltriti M., Drilon, A. NTRK fusion-positive cancers and TRK inhibitor therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018; 15: 731–47. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-018-0113-0
|
|