Author:
Silva Edilson Marcelino,Ribeiro Thais Destefani,Fernandes Jaqueline Gonçalves,Muniz Joel Augusto
Abstract
Agricultural management is a viable way for recycling animal residues in feedlots. Thesubstances that make up organic residues change the dynamics of the organic matter decompositionin the soil. Information on carbon mineralization curves allows seeking improvements in soil qualityand, consequently, in crop productivity. The Stanford & Smith Nonlinear Model is the most usedto describe C mineralization of organic residues in the soil. This model considers organic residuesare composed of substances that are mineralized exponentially. The Cabrera Model considers twofractions, one composed of substances that are mineralized exponentially and other composed ofmore resistant substances with constant mineralization. The objective of this work was to comparenonlinear models that describe carbon mineralization, considering residues on surface or incorporatedinto the soil. The data evaluated were from an experiment with oat straw, liquid swine manure, andswine litter bedding. The Stanford & Smith and Cabrera Models were used considering structure offirst order autoregressive errors - AR(1), when necessary. The fittings were compared using the AkaikeInformation Criterion (AIC). The Cabrera Model was more adequate to describe C mineralization infour treatments (soil + incorporated liquid swine manure; soil + oat straw on surface + liquid swinemanure on surface; soil + incorporated straw; and soil + straw on surface). The Stanford & SmithModel was better in three treatments (soil + incorporated straw + incorporated liquid swine manure;swine litter bedding on surface; and incorporated swine litter bedding). None of the models describedthe treatment soil + liquid swine manure on surface.Keywords: Decomposition. Half-life. Stanford & Smith Model. Cabrera Model.
Publisher
IFSULDEMINAS (Instituto Federal do Sul de Minas)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献