Association between age and efficacy of first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapies for mRCC: a meta-analysis

Author:

Yanagisawa Takafumi12ORCID,Quhal Fahad13ORCID,Kawada Tatsushi14ORCID,Bekku Kensuke14ORCID,Laukhtina Ekaterina15ORCID,Rajwa Pawel16ORCID,Deimling Markus von17ORCID,Chlosta Marcin18,Pradere Benjamin19ORCID,Karakiewicz Pierre I10,Mori Keiichiro2ORCID,Kimura Takahiro2ORCID,Schmidinger Manuela1,Shariat Shahrokh F111121314ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria

2. Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan

3. Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, 32253, Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan

5. Institute for Urology & Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, 119435, Russia

6. Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, 41-800, Poland

7. Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, 20251, Germany

8. Clinic of Urology & Urological Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, 30-688, Poland

9. Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, 31130, France

10. Cancer Prognostics & Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada

11. Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, 19328, Jordan

12. Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA

13. Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, 15006, Czech Republic

14. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY 10021, USA

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients stratified by chronological age. Methods: According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) from randomized controlled trials were synthesized. Results: Five RCTs were eligible for meta-analyses. ICI-based combinations significantly improved OS compared with sunitinib alone, both in younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients, whereas the OS benefit was significantly better in younger patients (p = 0.007). ICI-based combinations did not improve OS in patients aged ≥75 years. Treatment rankings showed age-related differential recommendations regarding improved OS. Conclusion: OS benefit from first-line ICI-based combinations was significantly greater in younger patients. Age-related differences could help enrich shared decision-making.

Publisher

Future Medicine Ltd

Subject

Oncology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3